_Stu_Gray_Alamy.jpg?disable=upscale&width=1200&height=630&fit=crop)
May 16, 2024 at 10:10AM
The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) initially created by NIST to centralize cybersecurity vulnerability intelligence is now struggling due to various factors. Increased accessibility led to a surge in low-quality reports, with inexperienced researchers seeking recognition and monetary incentives. As a result, the NVD has not updated vulnerabilities since February, highlighting the need to refine existing frameworks.
Based on the meeting notes, here are the key takeaways:
1. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) is currently the most widely used software vulnerability database in the world, but it has not enriched vulnerabilities since Feb. 12, which poses a risk to those relying on its reports.
2. Three factors have impacted the NVD’s ability to sufficiently classify security concerns:
a. Credit-seeking contributors: Inexperienced researchers seeking recognition led to a decline in the quality of reports.
b. Widespread accessibility: The globalization of the internet allowed more people to contribute, leading to an increase in low-quality reports and the monetization of security vulnerabilities on the Dark Web.
c. Monetary incentives: Bug bounties led to a focus on quantity over quality in reporting vulnerabilities.
3. Impact on vendors: Vendors now face an onslaught of security disclosures, many of which do not provide meaningful insight or exploitability, leading to increased workload and less time for quality research.
4. The aftermath: The CVE program introduced a federated model to handle the increased load of reported vulnerabilities, while the NVD’s single-threaded system struggled to keep up with the flood of low-quality reports.
5. The cybersecurity community must reassess its reliance on the NVD and adapt its processes to meet the evolving dynamics of vulnerability management in order to ensure the integrity and efficacy of collective security efforts.
These insights highlight the need to address the current systemic issues and consider alternative models, such as the federated approach, to improve the classification and handling of vulnerabilities.