June 13, 2024 at 08:47PM
During a US House committee hearing, Microsoft president Brad Smith faced scrutiny over security breaches involving China-backed spies. Smith admitted to the company’s errors and defended its operations in China, prompting further questioning from lawmakers about compliance with Beijing’s national security laws. Other topics included the role of Microsoft in assisting government agencies and conspiracy theories regarding cybersecurity.
From the meeting notes, it is clear that there were intense discussions about Microsoft’s operations and security failings, particularly related to its dealings in China and the recent cyber intrusions into US government officials’ email accounts. Microsoft president Brad Smith faced tough questioning from lawmakers regarding the company’s level of responsibility and compliance with Chinese national security laws.
Smith acknowledged Microsoft’s responsibility for the security breaches outlined in the Homeland Security Cyber Safety Review Board’s report. However, he also attempted to deflect blame and downplayed the significance of the State Department’s discovery of the digital intrusion. Lawmakers expressed skepticism and emphasized the high reliance of the federal government on Microsoft’s products and services.
There were also concerns raised about Microsoft’s presence in China and the potential impact of Chinese national security laws on the company’s operations. Representatives questioned the trustworthiness of Microsoft’s assertions about its compliance with Chinese regulations, highlighting the perceived cozy relationship between the company and the Chinese government.
Moreover, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene used her time to voice conspiracy theories about the Cyber Safety Review Board and the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, alleging collusion with big tech and social media companies to suppress First Amendment rights.
Overall, the meeting reflected a contentious exchange between Microsoft executives and lawmakers, with ongoing scrutiny and skepticism about the company’s operations, security measures, and compliance with relevant regulations.