Small US Cyber Agencies Are Underfunded & That’s a Problem

Small US Cyber Agencies Are Underfunded & That's a Problem

November 20, 2024 at 10:12AM

The commentary emphasizes the underfunding of essential U.S. cybersecurity agencies, particularly NIST and the National Vulnerabilities Database (NVD). It argues that inadequate resources jeopardize the nation’s cybersecurity efforts, urging Congress to provide appropriate funding to safeguard critical infrastructure and maintain the U.S.’s status as a cyber superpower.

### Meeting Takeaways:

1. **Underfunded Cybersecurity Agencies**:
– Many government agencies, including NIST and the NVD, play critical roles in cybersecurity but are chronically underfunded and short-staffed.
– While agencies like NSA, FBI, and CISA receive significant attention, other agencies also significantly contribute to national cybersecurity.

2. **Importance of NVD**:
– The National Vulnerabilities Database (NVD) is essential for tracking IT vulnerabilities and preventing exploitation by malicious actors.
– The NVD’s management and enrichment by NIST have been crucial for many organizations’ vulnerability management systems.

3. **Recent Disruption**:
– In February 2024, NIST abruptly stopped enriching NVD entries, likely due to resource shortages, leading to increased global cyber-risk and operational challenges for organizations reliant on that data.

4. **Funding Challenges**:
– The broader issue is the overall underfunding of government entities responsible for cybersecurity, as evidenced by decreasing budget allocations despite increasing responsibilities.
– The use of continuing resolutions for funding compounds the problem, preventing agencies from adapting to inflation, mission demands, or initiating new programs.

5. **Need for Proper Resourcing**:
– There is a strong call for Congress to allocate appropriate funding to support the cybersecurity functions of various government agencies.
– A reevaluation is needed to determine if certain cybersecurity functions should remain within government or be transferred to the private sector or nonprofit organizations.

6. **Implications for National Security**:
– The disconnect between policy objectives and funding is critiqued, indicating that without adequate resources, cybersecurity policies cannot achieve intended outcomes.
– The U.S. must proactively invest in cybersecurity to maintain its status as a cyber superpower and address the evolving challenges in the digital landscape.

7. **Call to Action**:
– Emphasis on the necessity for tough funding decisions and a shift in perspective on the importance of cybersecurity as a critical national function.
– The meeting underscores the urgency to address these funding discrepancies to safeguard national security, economic prosperity, and public safety.

Full Article